Saturday, June 21, 2025

What’s in a Title? Reflections on 'Reverend' and the Use of Titles in Ministry

 

Introduction: A Name, A Title, and a Tension

In certain Christian circles, few things stir more debate than the use of titles—especially religious ones—before someone’s name. The title Reverend often becomes the center of this debate. Interestingly, although I personally do not use Reverend in my own introductions or communications, I often find it added to my name when others design flyers or introduce me at meetings. When I’ve had the choice, I’ve preferred simpler, context-appropriate titles like Pastor or Dr., depending on the occasion. 

This isn’t merely a personal preference; it opens a broader discussion. Why does the use of titles trigger such strong responses? And what can Scripture, culture, and even language history teach us about this?


The Meaning, Origin, and Use of the Title "Reverend"

The word Reverend comes from the Latin word "reverendus", which means "worthy of reverence" or "to be revered." It is a passive form of the Latin verb revereri, meaning "to respect" or "to revere."

The term began to appear in English around the 15th century and was originally an adjective used to describe a person, as in "the reverend father." Over time, it evolved into a formal title placed before the names of clergy members in many Christian denominations. For example, The Reverend John Smith became a common way to refer to an ordained minister.

In its original usage, Reverend did not imply that the person was to be worshiped or exalted, but rather that their office or role in spiritual leadership was worthy of respect. It reflected the dignity of the calling, not the personal worthiness of the individual.

Today, the use of Reverend varies widely. Some denominations use it frequently, while others avoid it altogether. In some contexts, it's viewed as too formal or hierarchical. In others, it's considered a sign of honor and proper protocol.


1. Titles Are About Communication, Not Elevation

At its core, language exists to communicate. Titles like Reverend, Pastor, or Doctor aren’t inherently prideful or righteous. They are often used simply to convey one’s role or responsibility.

When someone addresses a church leader as Pastor John or Dr. Smith, it may not be about giving status—it may be about showing respect, giving clarity, or indicating function. Like saying Coach Taylor or Professor Adams, it helps people understand a person’s role within a specific context.

But like all words, titles evolve.


2. The Curious Absence of Titles in Scripture

This brings us to something fascinating: Jesus and the apostles were rarely, if ever, addressed with titles.

We don’t read:

  • “Reverend Jesus Christ”

  • “Bishop Paul”

  • “Apostle Peter” (except when Paul asserts his authority in letters)

In the early church, believers related to one another as brothers and sisters, not through layers of hierarchy. Jesus Himself warned against the desire for titles:

“But you are not to be called ‘Rabbi,’ for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers.”
— Matthew 23:8 (NIV)

This wasn’t a condemnation of leadership—it was a rebuke of pride and position-seeking.


3. Language, Culture, and Translation Gaps

In some languages, especially due to direct or informal translations, Jesus is referred to in ways that feel casual—even disrespectful. In cultures where elders are addressed with utmost formality, it’s ironic when our Lord is referenced in familiar or even irreverent tones.

This isn’t about forcing a title on Jesus. It’s about examining how our language choices reflect (or fail to reflect) reverence. If we show verbal honor to earthly leaders but casually mention Christ, something may be off in our spiritual instincts.


4. Words Change with Time—And So Do Titles

Here's a critical insight: the meaning of words is not fixed. They shift over time—based on how people use them. That's why we shouldn’t get overly rigid or defensive about the use or non-use of titles.

To illustrate this, here are some English words whose meanings have changed dramatically over time:

  1. AwfulThen: Full of awe or wonder; Now: Terrible or bad

  2. NiceThen: Foolish or ignorant; Now: Kind or pleasant

  3. SillyThen: Innocent or blessed; Now: Foolish or trivial

  4. GirlThen: A young person of either gender; Now: A female child

  5. HussyThen: Housewife; Now: A woman with questionable morals

  6. ArtificialThen: Skillfully made; Now: Fake or unnatural

  7. ClueThen: A ball of thread; Now: A piece of evidence

  8. MeatThen: Any solid food; Now: Flesh of animals

  9. EgregiousThen: Outstandingly good; Now: Shockingly bad

  10. LiterallyThen: Exactly as stated; Now: Often used figuratively

  11. GayThen: Happy, carefree, or bright; Now: Primarily refers to sexual orientation

This simple list shows how much meanings drift, and titles are no different. What one generation sees as respectful, another may see as outdated. What one culture views as prideful, another views as polite.

As words evolve, we must acknowledge that we cannot be dogmatic just because we know the original meaning. A great example is the word worship. In Scripture, worship involves deep reverence, submission, and sacrifice—a heart posture before God. However, to many people today, worship simply means attending a church service or singing a few songs. That modern use may be incomplete, but it shows how language adapts over time. Being aware of that helps us teach and communicate more effectively, rather than simply correcting or criticizing.

There are also people who misuse titles or even use fake titles. Just like there's counterfeit in other areas of society, it exists in ministry as well. But openly mocking or ridiculing such people is not healthy. It often has the opposite effect: it makes others more critical, cultivates pride in those mocking, and causes people to look down on others rather than restore or correct them in love.


5. Keep the Focus on the Mission, Not the Title

At the end of the day, the real question is not: What should I be called? but:
How am I living, and whom am I serving?

Whether someone calls you Reverend, Pastor, Brother, or simply your name, the deeper issue is the condition of your heart and the clarity of your calling.

When I am introduced with a title, I neither insist on it nor reject it unless it causes confusion. I’ve found it most helpful to adapt based on context—using Pastor in ministry settings or Dr. in academic contexts—not for status, but for service and clarity.

Let’s not get caught up in the wrapping. Let’s make sure what’s inside—the message, the life, the ministry—is pure and Christlike.


Conclusion: Be Known for Your Character, Not Just Your Title

In an age where names carry weight and titles carry expectations, may we be most eager to carry the name of Christ well. Titles can be helpful. They can also be hollow. The best “title” we could ever earn is one Jesus used freely:

“Well done, good and faithful servant.” (Matthew 25:23)



No comments:

What’s in a Title? Reflections on 'Reverend' and the Use of Titles in Ministry

  Introduction: A Name, A Title, and a Tension In certain Christian circles, few things stir more debate than the use of titles—especially r...